12/5/2023 0 Comments Fujifilm x t3 full frame![]() ![]() Both cameras produce good color, though the Fuji's are a bit warmer and not quite as saturated.įujifilm X-T3 vs Panasonic G9 at Base ISO ![]() The X-T3 resolves more fine detail in our red-leaf swatch even though contrast is lower, while the E-M1 II renders it smoother but with less detail, however the Olympus does better with thread pattern in the pink fabric. The Olympus produces a crisper image with higher contrast, though default sharpening also appears to be higher. Luminance noise appears higher from the Fuji, but chrominance noise is higher from the Olympus. You would think the 26-megapixel X-T3 would have a noticeable resolution advantage over the 20-megapixel E-M1 II here, but both cameras have fairly similar resolutions on the vertical axis (4160 vs 3888 pixels) which is how this scene is framed, so the resolution difference is pretty minor and mostly boils down to different demosaicing algorithms and processing. Overall, though, very similar image quality here at base ISO with just slightly higher noise and resolution from the X-T3, along with an improved default tone curve that retains more visible detail in deep shadows.Ībove we compare the Micro Four Thirds Olympus E-M1 Mark II to the APS-C X-T3. Micro contrast and sharpness are slightly better from the X-T3, but we upgraded lenses since the X-T2 was shot, from the Fujinon 60mm f/2.4 macro to the 56mm f/1.2, which is the main reason for the minor improvements in sharpness and contrast. The X-T2 appears to do slightly better with our red-leaf swatch, but the X-T3's slight increase in resolution is likely resolving a bit more of the individual thread pattern which tends to interfere with and break-up the leaf pattern somewhat. Deep shadows are however more detailed and not as crushed as from the X-T2, which is a nice improvement. Whatever the reason, the X-T3 does look just a bit noisier. This could be due to faster circuitry required for the X-T3's higher performance, or perhaps as a result from the vast increase in PDAF pixels and related circuitry over the X-T2. The X-T3 has a slightly lower base ISO of 160 which combined with its newer backside-illuminated sensor should perhaps yield lower noise despite marginally smaller photosites, however when examining the flatter or darker areas of the scene, we see the X-T3 image does contain slightly higher noise levels. And remember, you can always go to our world-renowned Comparometer to compare the Fuji X-T3 to any camera we've ever tested! Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T2 at Base ISOĪbove we compare the 26-megapixel X-T3 to its predecessor, the 24-megapixel X-T2. For those interested in working with the RAW files involved, click these links to visit each camera's respective sample image thumbnail page: Fuji X-T3, Fuji X-T2, Nikon D500, Olympus E-M1 II, Panasonic G9 and Sony A6500 - links to the RAW files appear beneath those for the JPEG images, wherever we have them. Clicking any crop will take you to a carrier page where you can click once again to access the full resolution image as delivered straight from the camera. All cameras in this comparison were shot with our very sharp reference lenses. NOTE: These images are from best quality JPEGs straight out of the camera, at default settings including noise reduction and using the camera's actual base ISO (not extended ISO settings). ![]() ![]() Below are crops from our laboratory Still Life target comparing the Fuji X-T3's JPEG image quality to its predecessor's, the X-T2, as well as against several premium high performance interchangeable lens cameras in its price range: the Nikon D500, the Olympus E-M1 Mark II, the Panasonic G9 and the Sony A6500. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |